Marsel Ilhan vs Gilad Ben Zvi Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W W L L
Form
L L L L W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Ilhan 1 - 0 Zvi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilhan winning 2 and Zvi winning 0. The last match between Ilhan and Zvi was at the Turkey F34, 26-08-2013, Second, Hard with Marsel Ilhan getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marsel Ilhan | 1 |
| Gilad Ben Zvi | 0 |
Turkey F34(26-08-2013)
6
4
6
3
| Ilhan | Stats | Zvi |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 877 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 77 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 37 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 23 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (650-453) | Career Total W/L | 41% (70-99) |
| $591,915 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Marsel Ilhan
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gokberk Saritas
Player
Marsel Ilhan
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Lars Goran Verwerft
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Alper Okay Meryumoglu
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
S Mert Ozdemir
Player
Marsel Ilhan
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Marsel Ilhan
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Gokberk Saritas
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Gilad Ben Zvi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joshua Milton
Player
Gilad Ben Zvi
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Gilad Ben Zvi
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Gilad Ben Zvi
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (650/453) | Win/Loss | 41% (70/99) |
| 57% (1470/1119) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (167/208) |
| 52% (12964/11880) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1634/1707) |
| 65% (303/166) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (70/86) |
| 56% (246/194) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/9) |
| 54% (82/71) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 46% (19/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 3122 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1456 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:1:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 574.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 34.11 |
| 61% (32773/54139) | 1st Serve % | 66% (232/351) |
| 69% (22762/32773) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (140/232) |
| 49% (10543/21365) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (54/119) |
| 42% (2155/5167) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (10/22) |
| 39% (21251/54404) | Return Points Win % | 34% (117/346) |
| 51% (36/35) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (18/17) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 72% (13/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (65/75) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (186/141) | Challenger W/L | 38% (8/13) |
| 65% (332/180) | Futures W/L | 42% (62/86) |
| 59% (617/1050) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (69/163) |
| 56% (23/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (183/340) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 15% (5/33) |
| 55% (183/335) | Deciding Set Win % | 34% (14/41) |
| 88% (621/547) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (76/63) |
| 12% (621/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (76/13) |
| 21% (481/101) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (93/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
